A Philosophic Challenge Essay -- Theory of Evolution, Darwin, DNA

Did you know the odds of proteins necessary to create a cosmic string of DNA lining up in order naturally are only once in 4x10022 years? (Werner 104). Thats highly improbable Darwin didnt anticipate that future discoveries would disprove the fundamental tenants of his surmise of evolution. Modern science is repeatedly uncovering evidence that Darwinian evolution cannot be the explanation for deportment on earth because it relies on an implausible claim of spontaneous generation, leaves gaps in the fossil record, and is contradicted by emerging scientific discoveries. Spontaneous generation refers to the theory that the premier life form evolved rapidly out of nothing, and all organisms evolved gradually from the original life form. Mounting evidence makes the argument for spontaneous generation untenable. No biologic phyla (a level of organism classification) have yet been discovered to support Darwins theory. Even more condemning is that Darwin understood taxonomy (the classif ication of living organisms), but he refused to acknowledge or account for the gaps in his theory (Wilker 24). For example, spontaneous generation, a necessary assumption in Darwins theory, cannot explain how proteins are formed. Evolutionists suggest that both proteins or DNA were involved in the freshman living organism. However, proteins cannot be formed naturally, yet are required for DNA (Werner 105). This raises the chicken and egg question, which came first? Evolutionists cannot explain this, providing no justification for how proteins and DNA could have been involved in spontaneous generation. Amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, would have had to form naturally to allow for the hatchway of spontaneous generation. Yet, an experiment conducte... ...naturalists for using the existence of vestigial organs as an argument for evolution, stating vestigial organs provide no evidence for evolutionary theory. (qtd. in Wells, Why Darwinism) More and more scientific eviden ce is overturning the biologically based arguments used to support Darwins theory. Darwins theory falls short of fulfilling explanations for the set out of life. Darwins suggestion that life is spontaneously generated is a leap of faith not supported by science. The fossil record is full of gaps that Darwins theory cannot explain, and new discoveries in biology undermine the basis the of evolutionary theory. While Darwins theory may have initially seemed plausible when it was first published, contemporary science has provided evidence that the foundations and hypotheses on which Darwins theory of evolution are based cannot possibly be true.